RC India
Welcome Guest, please login or register.
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Topic Tools Topic Tools 
Read
« on: June 19, 2009, 01:15:23 PM »
sandeepm
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 14 
sandeepm has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Mumbai
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 1008
Join Date: Mar, 2009




I would like to know one simple thing.............
in pusher conf. motor and prop is mounted in reverse order then standard mounting see below:

http://img36.picoodle.com/img/img36/2/6/19/sandeepm/f_motorpositim_30bdd1c.jpg
Motor and prop. Position


My Question : can the motor and prop. be mounted in standard way in pusher jets designs?

Sandeep
Logged

Fly high if you have good set of batteries.....!
 

Read
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2009, 01:36:14 PM »
santhosh
Heli Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 7 
santhosh has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 507
Join Date: Mar, 2009



yes  u  can mount the motor and the prop  in  the standard way
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2009, 02:10:59 PM »
RotorZone
Forum Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 8 
RotorZone has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Bangalore
State: Karnataka
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 607
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RotorZone.com



In pusher configurations the heavy motor at the back makes it difficult to achieve proper CG. You'll need to move the battery way forward and still need to add weight in some cases. Having the motor closer to CG reduces this issue.
Logged

 

Read
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2009, 02:20:36 PM »
rcforall
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 22 
rcforall barely matters.rcforall barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1663
Join Date: Mar, 2009



As Rajesh says Simple Principal of levers , as the distance of the load from the fulcrum ( CG ) increases  a greater effort is required to counter the effect of that load .
JUST IMAGINE THE PLANE TO BE A 1ST ORDER LEVER WITH THE CG AS THE FULCRUM  AND WITHOUT THE THRUST OF THE MOTOR THE ANSWER IS THEN EASY TO COMPREHEND .
This is one of the main reasons for Heavier planes having their servos around the CG or at least close to it .

Sai
« Last Edit: June 19, 2009, 02:30:29 PM by rcforall » Logged

www.zuppa.io : vehicle telematics, ADAS, IoT , Drones
 

Read
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2009, 05:10:22 PM »
izmile
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 7 
izmile has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Reading (England)
State: OUTSIDE INDIA
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 591
Join Date: Mar, 2009

I am a Corogamist!



Yes, you can mount the motor in the way you have shown. But the reasons Rotor said will perfectly apply. Further you need to run longer wires around the prop clearance to get to the battery. If its glow motor then you possibly have the fuel tank further behind the motor - compounding the CG balancing issue.
Logged

"Anything can fly" - SPADs just prove that!
 

Read
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2009, 05:14:40 PM »
Pikle6
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 13 
Pikle6 has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Navi Mumbai
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1050
Join Date: Apr, 2009

VTOL - Vertical Take Off & Landing



that is just what i did in f22 w/thrust vectoring  the battery was placed in the cockpit area and there ran an extension battery wire to make it reach up to the cockpit. for prop mounting if you do not have a pusher prop but do have a pusher motor just flip the prop and insert your prop there you have it a pusher prop
Logged

E.V.Subramanian
Yak55|EasyFly Glider 1.9m|Skyfun|Easystar II|Quad Talon V2|Mini Saturn
 

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to: