RC India
Welcome Guest, please login or register.
 
Pages: [1]   Go Down
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Topic Tools Topic Tools 
Read
« on: February 08, 2015, 02:14:38 PM »
jj4u
Plane Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
jj4u has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Mapusa, Goa
State: Goa
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 44
Join Date: Mar, 2014




Hi everyone
 i am a bit of dreamer? but that is how it all ideas  began ?
i have a quad 450 cm,completed needed a cheap fpv with tx and rx ( low budget)
was checking the entire forum for a answer so posting anew one
a question ( if it is not  stupid ) to attach an old android phone( i usually change one in 6 month)
as FPV since it has most function required for fpv :  a cam 13mp , wifi or 3g connection for transmitter,  battery self contained, and another android mobile as receiver??? as far as limited wifi range is concerned in direct wifi using hypergain antenna ? ?
there is an  app to make phone as security cam
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.warden.cam&hl=en
or else someone expert could develop codec for the same???

can anyone help??? this could an easy and cheap solution for making an affordable quad???

another great idea was using modified android phone as quad control board or receiver??
AWAITING GUYS FOR IDEAS.
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2015, 03:58:38 PM »
Dharmik
Heli Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 13 
Dharmik has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Bharuch
State: Gujarat
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1097
Join Date: Sep, 2011



You would like to check this as well
http://www.rcindia.org/self-designed-diy-and-college-projects/using-cellphone-as-fpv-system
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2015, 05:16:00 PM »
quadbro
Plane Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
quadbro has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Gurgaon
State: Haryana
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 10
Join Date: Jan, 2015



yes, i think 3G/LTE is going to be the next-gen in fpv. high latency and network congestion are still issues with 3G. also, digital video codecs still haven't been fully optimized for robustness and high reliability on 3G/LTE. safety is a huge factor with these systems. you don't want to lose your video stream arbitrarily especially if your system is not in line of sight. very dangerous situation indeed.

for now there are already some companies that are actively creating 3G/LTE fpv systems - Skydrone - http://www.skydrone.aero/.

but for now you can try Airboss - http://airboss.io/ - its converts your 3G/LTE phone into a FPV system.

good luck and stay safe!

« Last Edit: February 08, 2015, 05:41:41 PM by quadbro » Logged
 

Read
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2015, 05:31:31 PM »
AnjanBabu
Aj Creations
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 9 
AnjanBabu has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Bangalore
State: Karnataka
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 576
Join Date: Jan, 2012



The simplest FPV solution I can think of, using a smartphone would be to simply Skype. Not necessarily cheap or a bulletproof link though.
Logged

Mechatronics engineer . Hopeless realist

anjanbabu.wordpress.com
 

Read
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2015, 05:54:54 PM »
quadbro
Plane Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
quadbro has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Gurgaon
State: Haryana
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 10
Join Date: Jan, 2015



Skype would not be advisable. Your video stream should be up and running 100% of the time, and Skype just doesn't fare well in that aspect. You need a dedicated codec designed for robust 3G/LTE FPV purely for safety. Unless you buy a dedicated 3G/LTE system, stick to analog FPV, as it is more reliable and has been around for longer.

For example, people build bridges that can withstand several times the weight than they should on average require. So a bridge that will be rated for 1000 cars traveling across will be designed such that it can withstand 10,000 cars. This is a safety factor to account for extreme situations. Same things applies to FPV systems. It shouldn't 'work most of the time', rather it should be designed to work well in the worst situations.

FPV-related crashes can be very dangerous and can lead to the whole hobby being ruined due to loss of life or property. I'm not going overboard, I just don't people to make a mistake they will regret dearly.
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2015, 07:10:27 PM »
IndianHobbyShop
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 6 
IndianHobbyShop has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Patna
State: Bihar
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 527
Join Date: Jul, 2013



Rightly said by quadbro, Using 3G/LTE/WiFi from regular phone the basic way certainly isn't reliable enough for FPV as the lag one will get can be quite high at times (Even with direct P2P Wi-Fi connection).


(Watch at 4:00)


But it sure is an area that you can explore.

These can be used as a Video for reference while flying in sight.
Just don't use the Video feed to fly. Fly the conventional way and just enjoy the video feed from time to time  Thumbs Up
Logged

Regards,
Bhavesh
Indian Hobby Shop
PH# 9473456377
 

Read
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2015, 08:57:34 AM »
v2 eagle
AK
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 12 
v2 eagle has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1178
Join Date: Jun, 2013



This is definitely Doable and it is quite an innovative idea i should say, but the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
 
It doesnt fit any factor in comparison with a normal FPV TX/RX system except a secure link. No one can see what you are seeing!

A normal TX/RX is cheaper than a mobile phone(even in LHS too!!) An android phone with a decent camera and all the above said features like 3G/WIFI will cost at least 5K and then you have to shell out at least 200rs for a good 3G connection.

In contrast, a well set FPV TX will give you at least 800m range which is more than enough unless you are aiming for long range record making.
weight is again a big factor, and FPV setup will not go beyond 50gms with a home made CP antenna.
Video lag, network issues, phone getting hanged, losing your phone along with your copter, are all negatives in this design.
And most places that you SHOULD fly FPV is barren lands and devoid of people where i really doubt you will find any good network connection.

with all that said, i still would try this when i find a cheaper gsm .....

Ashok.P
Logged

 

Read
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2015, 09:18:26 AM »
sundaram
FAN OF FPV FLYING, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY & MICRO RC
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 38 
sundaram is working their way up.sundaram is working their way up.sundaram is working their way up.
Offline Offline

City: Gandhinagar
State: Gujarat
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 3407
Join Date: Nov, 2009



http://www.rcindia.org/rc-general-topics/wifi-fpv-fpv-with-android-phone-camera-sensors-connected-over-wifi-on-wan/msg152601/#msg152601

see the links to the apps posted here by me. Quite interesting. with wifi extenders or directional amplified antenna transmission of wifi routers dooable experimentation.  Smiley
Logged

 

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
rc sim for mobile
Radios and Receivers
ankur 11 8911 Last post March 29, 2010, 10:27:49 PM
by ankur
Mobile lost..... « 1 2  All »
Chatter Zone
Sreedhar 44 24135 Last post October 15, 2011, 08:27:59 AM
by vineet
DIY - Transmitter battery pack from mobile phone batteries. « 1 2  All »
Batteries and Chargers
sooraj.palakkad 29 21119 Last post February 16, 2015, 05:34:15 PM
by sooraj.palakkad
5.8 GHz OTG FPV Receiver For Android Mobile Phone
Radios and Receivers
Dharmik 4 4840 Last post May 05, 2017, 09:57:57 AM
by Swapnil
Can I use li- ion mobile battery for my rc aircraft?
RC India Forum
mukulmw 5 3371 Last post May 08, 2017, 08:23:23 PM
by K K Iyer