RC India
Welcome Guest, please login or register.
 
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Topic Tools Topic Tools 
Read
« on: July 22, 2015, 09:47:07 PM »
K K Iyer
Global Moderator
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 50 
K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.
Offline Offline

City: Indore
State: Madhya Pradesh
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 4209
Join Date: Jan, 2012




@anwar sir,
Considering that this forum has over 13000 members, i feel that you and senior moderators like rcpilotacro are the right persons to steer a petition to DGCA from RCI. (One presumes AMAI is doing something similar)

A draft is offered here, based on my email to DGCA on 12th Oct 2014.

1. DGCA could set up a website for flyers of remote controlled aircraft models to register on
2. Flyers of RC aircraft models can register by providing their name, ID, address, phone number, transmitter frequency and location of usual flying site, and get a registration number.
3. Flyers of non remote controlled models need not register.
4. Main restrictions can be:
- weight not to exceed 5kg
- no flight above 400 ft
- no flight within 5km of an ATC airport
- no flight over public or vehicles or houses. Rules for permission can be worked out.

The DGCA registration can be like a car numberplate. Flyers can proudly display on their models.

Anyone caught in suspicious circumstances can easily be identified as a bonafide hobbyist or not.

For many decades we were not allowed to photograph airports, something that is now allowed.
All aeromodellers are not necessarily enemies of the State!

Sir, if you don't take the lead, we'll have a lot of talk on the forum, and NO action!
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2015, 10:19:27 PM »
K K Iyer
Global Moderator
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 50 
K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.
Offline Offline

City: Indore
State: Madhya Pradesh
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 4209
Join Date: Jan, 2012



As santanucus says in another thread, maybe we need to go higher.

The petition may need to be addressed to the PMO, copy to Minister for Civil Aviation and DGCA.
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2015, 10:25:30 PM »
Swapnil
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 20 
Swapnil barely matters.Swapnil barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Pune
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1751
Join Date: May, 2010

Retreat, Hell!



...
- no flight over public or vehicles or houses. Rules for permission can be worked out.

The DGCA registration can be like a car numberplate. Flyers can proudly display on their models....


Iyer sir,

I'd like to share my views while Anwar sir ponders upon all this.

1) All this negative stuff started with multirotors. I love RC as much as any hardcore RC enthusiast, but honestly, multirotors are just flying blenders even in experienced hands. Even if the propellers are shrouded, a falling multirotor can cause a lot of damage. I think the law should be that RC models capable of flight should ONLY be allowed in large open areas far away from residential areas.

2) Micro sized shrouded multirotors should be allowed indoors. Multirotors weighing less than 1 Kg should be allowed within the confines of the licenced individual's private property.

3) We should have licences for RC just like we have for vehicles. That way over-excited newbies and photographers won't be able to take to the air right away.

Logged
 

Read
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2015, 10:34:58 PM »
Swapnil
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 20 
Swapnil barely matters.Swapnil barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Pune
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1751
Join Date: May, 2010

Retreat, Hell!



As santanucus says in another thread, maybe we need to go higher.

The petition may need to be addressed to the PMO, copy to Minister for Civil Aviation and DGCA.

And while doing this we really need to take into consideration their perspective. For them it's a grown-up-kids' hobby VS national security. Also, the new breed of bad guys is using all kinds of technology while trying to infiltrate our lands. Maybe we should wait till after 15 August.
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2015, 10:39:17 PM »
SuperCheap
Heli Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
SuperCheap has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: delhi
State: Delhi
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 24
Join Date: Mar, 2015



License shall be required for all the purpose including leisure as well. Although FAA has made license not mandatory for leisure purpose. But it shall be required in india since In india Terrorism is a major issue.
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2015, 10:49:04 PM »
K K Iyer
Global Moderator
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 50 
K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.
Offline Offline

City: Indore
State: Madhya Pradesh
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 4209
Join Date: Jan, 2012



Just a thought
Maybe the IED and katta makers get permission from local administration...

Not clear why this is getting so complicated.
It's simple:
1. Register and fly as per safety rules
2. Otherwise fly and go to jail
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2015, 10:51:29 PM »
santanucus
Plane Lover
Forum Veteran
****

Reputation Power: 5 
santanucus has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Kolkata
State: West Bengal
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 396
Join Date: May, 2015



If we go by UAV wise registration that would be a huge problem. A person may make or purchase many UAVs as part of his hobby. Often they dismantle one and make another from the components.  Just imagine if he has to go to DGCA everytime to get his new plane/quad registered. I think we should not give this proposal on our own. Rather, flyer-wise permission may be considered. This is like bargaining. We don't want to give in lots of concessions right at the beginning. In fact why suggest a "licence raj" type of restrictions right at the beginning? We shall gradually up the ante as we progress. If we start at a position of disadvantage, we'd end up with more disadvantage.

9/11 happened in USA..not India. If they can go for a licence-free regime, why do we insist upon licences from the beginning?
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2015, 10:55:04 PM »
SuperCheap
Heli Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
SuperCheap has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: delhi
State: Delhi
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 24
Join Date: Mar, 2015




But sir in US . We need to obtain registration from FAA.(Not mandatory for some purpose). Since DGCA is likely to copy those rules. I am pretty much sure that it is going to happen.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2015, 01:09:19 PM by anwar » Logged
 

Read
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2015, 11:00:28 PM »
santanucus
Plane Lover
Forum Veteran
****

Reputation Power: 5 
santanucus has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Kolkata
State: West Bengal
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 396
Join Date: May, 2015



Please don't assume something from the beginning. DGCA will take FAA rules and put more restrictions in that. If we ourselves insist upon licensing even for recreational use then DGCA will impose even more restrictions. Licence for Commercial use is justified but for hobbies, if licences are required, it will become unpopular. Licences and restriction type Inspector Raj has become a thing of the past. Why insist upon it? I don't think we have to think what government wants..that is government's job. Our job as hobbyists is to put forward things that will be convenient to us.
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2015, 11:06:41 PM »
K K Iyer
Global Moderator
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 50 
K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.
Offline Offline

City: Indore
State: Madhya Pradesh
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 4209
Join Date: Jan, 2012



Maybe we need some 'out of the box' ideas...

One of the problems in India is how to implement helmet laws for two wheelers.

There is a simple answer.
Insurance Cos should introduce a clause that no claim will be entertained if helmet was not worn. Insured will be liable for all claims by aggrieved parties.
That's all.

Logged
 

Read
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2015, 11:21:06 PM »
K K Iyer
Global Moderator
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 50 
K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.K K Iyer is on the verge of being accepted.
Offline Offline

City: Indore
State: Madhya Pradesh
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 4209
Join Date: Jan, 2012



Registration could be an extention of 'licence raj'
But we do need driving licence, no?

Here's an 'out of the box idea'
If we are so concerned about 'security', why don't the police/security agencies just shoot down any 'aerial vehicle' they consider a security risk?
Our local cops know us, know that we are not a security risk, and often stop by to watch us fly.

Or just deflate both tires of helmetless riders.

Perhaps after we finish catching all the stray dogs...
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2015, 11:39:01 PM »
santanucus
Plane Lover
Forum Veteran
****

Reputation Power: 5 
santanucus has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Kolkata
State: West Bengal
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 396
Join Date: May, 2015



Maybe we need some 'out of the box' ideas...

In USA the FAA does not require licences for recreational use of UAVs. I think we should not insist upon the same in India. Licence Raj is a thing of the past and government does not have manpower to do that. Also Licence Raj will breed corruption.

But if you insist, a simplified online system may be considered (let us think out of box and not in 1960s-1980s terms Smiley)

My suggestions is this...please comment.

1. Let UAV fliers be registered online using a specific website.

2. Let flyers be identified and linked with Aadhar Number or Election Identity Card

3. They can register their UAVs online too. Photos, weight and other capabilities e.g camera, FPV, telemetry etc. and similar details can be uploaded by the user himself/herself

4. Places where they are likely to fly can be informed online by the user himself. For example, if I want to fly in Goa, I enter the time and dates and locations online. In fact flying locations can be pointed out on a Google Map mashup at the site. The map can also automatically display restricted areas where flying should not be done. Time based restricted areas can also be shown e.g. around Red Fort area on August 15th.

5. After entering details of UAV, a printout of UAV identification number can be generated and pasted on the UAV itself

6. After the user registers the location to fly (which can be a date or a range of dates) he can generate a printout, which he should carry with himself at the time of flying. Authorities can also ask for the slip anytime from the flier.


I think with this kind of simple online registration system in place, we'd not have a problem with flying or carrying the UAV anymore. User identification will be easy. And there will not be an issue of Licence raj. Such a system will address security concerns and also flyers' convenience.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2015, 01:09:03 PM by anwar » Logged
 

Read
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2015, 06:53:53 AM »
Swapnil
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 20 
Swapnil barely matters.Swapnil barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Pune
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1751
Join Date: May, 2010

Retreat, Hell!



...Our job as hobbyists is to put forward things that will be convenient to us.

Yeah, because our convenience is so much more important than safety and security.

Like Iyer sir said, we are over-complicating this. There should be just one simple law: fly in large open spaces far away from people.

This hobby is getting into more and more inept hands every day. I really don't mind standing in a queue to get registered if it means less noob disasters. I'll completely support the ban on flying around people if that's what it takes.

I like the idea of having a registration number based on our Aadhar card number. This way, if you aren't registered, face the consequences. If you are registered, simply follow the rules.

Individual models need not be registered. That's just stupid.
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2015, 10:52:29 AM »
foamybuilder
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 8 
foamybuilder has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Bangalore
State: Karnataka
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 626
Join Date: Sep, 2010



Very good suggestion here santanucus.
But the point is our lazy government will not implement anything..
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #14 on: July 23, 2015, 11:00:29 AM »
sidnov
Plane Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
sidnov has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Navi Mumbai
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 61
Join Date: Jul, 2015



guys, who is the head of rcindia.org??
i could draft a petition as from rcindia.org to the dgca through change.org
and with many good points of ideas as shared by y'all....pls reply...
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #15 on: July 23, 2015, 11:01:12 AM »
sidnov
Plane Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
sidnov has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Navi Mumbai
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 61
Join Date: Jul, 2015



we shud all demand more so then when dgca goes on cutting, we are left with what we wanted
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #16 on: July 23, 2015, 11:06:33 AM »
sidnov
Plane Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
sidnov has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Navi Mumbai
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 61
Join Date: Jul, 2015



i really feel change.org could work....by protesting together as "RCINDIA" we could do something.....can anyone tell where can i chat with the head of rcindia.org?
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #17 on: July 23, 2015, 11:08:44 AM »
sidnov
Plane Lover
Active Member
**

Reputation Power: 1 
sidnov has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Navi Mumbai
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 61
Join Date: Jul, 2015



https://www.change.org/p/npark-designate-space-in-public-parks-for-uav-hobbyists
in singapore, they are gonna assign special areas in parks for uav hobbyists...
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #18 on: July 23, 2015, 11:55:02 AM »
rcrcnitesh
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 22 
rcrcnitesh barely matters.rcrcnitesh barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 2154
Join Date: Jul, 2013


Re:

From my point of view this will be best.

1. We can get an license for flying planes, multirotors, helicopters and any other thing.
2. No need to get an license for every single plane, quad, etc.
3. Assign some places where we can fly.
4. For commercial purposes permission should be requieed for every single time they fly.

These is what I could think of!
Logged

Maker | Aeromodeller | Teenager
 

Read
« Reply #19 on: July 23, 2015, 01:01:42 PM »
santanucus
Plane Lover
Forum Veteran
****

Reputation Power: 5 
santanucus has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Kolkata
State: West Bengal
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 396
Join Date: May, 2015



Very good suggestion here santanucus.
But the point is our lazy government will not implement anything..

Its not about individuals. Its the system. The system in the government is such that nobody wants to take decisions. Everybody proposes "safe" measures to save his skin. That's why things don't get going. But there are ways to address this problem.

Please post your draft petitions. We can write individually, as a group, online in change.org and through all the means possible. The more, the better. But our letters should have a common framework to be effective.

As for Singapore, my opinion is that Singapore is a city state with very limited area. The can and should specify parks for flying. But India is a big country. There should be exclusion zones. But if there are only specific places to fly, that would be too restrictive and people would be fored to violate the law due to inconvenience.

As for licence, if its online, then even if we get every plane registered, that won't be a hassle. But ideally, I think like USA, government in our country should not impose licences on hobbyists. At the most it should be online self-declaration. But in the eventuality that licensing is imposed, how best to deal with it is the subject matter of our concern.
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #20 on: July 23, 2015, 01:14:24 PM »
anwar
Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 141 
anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

City: Doha (Qatar) & Thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 11619
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RC India - Flying and racing with open minds !



We don't have agreement over whether a licensing system would help or not ! Sad

Overall, anytime there is licensing involved, it seems to instill some discipline on the owners (like gun licenses in our country). It does typically come with lots of redtape and procedure (depositing guns at police stations during elections etc), and renewal hassles.  I am not sure licensing will be smooth in our country.

Putting simple but well defined ("CLEAR" !) rules might be the viable thing, along with designated spaces identified by local clubs.
Logged

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.
 

Read
« Reply #21 on: July 23, 2015, 01:19:41 PM »
divay99
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 11 
divay99 has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Noida
State: Uttar Pradesh
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 816
Join Date: May, 2010

There are no stupid questions, just stupid people



For Noida Aero Club (AMAI) here is what we did and its working great for us .....

IMG_1153_2.jpg
Re: Petition to DGCA
* IMG_1153_2.jpg (43.29 KB, 600x800 - viewed 998 times.)
Logged

Divay Puri
+91-98-119-63278
https://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/NOIDAAEROCLUB/
http://www.amai.in/noida.php
FUTABA T6EX|FUTABA 8FG|SEAGULL 40|SEAGULL FAIRCHILD -PT19|PIPER CUB - 90"|EDGE 540 EP TMPRO|YAK 54 .60| Mustang P51 .40|AXN FLOATER JET|HK Bixler|REACTOR 3D EP|U CAN DO 3D| Blitz SkySurfer|EDF Jet T-45 Goshawk|HK-450 GT PRO|Seagull PC-9 .91|Edge 540 20cc|Reactor 50cc|PC-9 30cc|SU 26 30cc|HK 450 GT|Hirobo Evo .50|MXSR 50cc|Tarot
 

Read
« Reply #22 on: July 23, 2015, 01:21:48 PM »
anwar
Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 141 
anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

City: Doha (Qatar) & Thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 11619
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RC India - Flying and racing with open minds !



It does "sound" really important.... basically should work Smiley
Logged

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.
 

Read
« Reply #23 on: July 23, 2015, 01:27:57 PM »
topalle
Topalle Srinivas Azad
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 13 
topalle has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Bangalore
State: Karnataka
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1000
Join Date: Jul, 2012



https://www.change.org/p/directorate-general-of-civil-aviation-form-rules-for-uav-flying-as-a-recreational-hobby?just_created=true
Logged

Amateur photographer ... DIY enthusiast ... Scratch Builder... Student-Innovator
 

Read
« Reply #24 on: July 23, 2015, 02:57:05 PM »
santanucus
Plane Lover
Forum Veteran
****

Reputation Power: 5 
santanucus has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Kolkata
State: West Bengal
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 396
Join Date: May, 2015



We don't have agreement over whether a licensing system would help or not ! Sad

Overall, anytime there is licensing involved, it seems to instill some discipline on the owners (like gun licenses in our country). It does typically come with lots of redtape and procedure (depositing guns at police stations during elections etc), and renewal hassles.  I am not sure licensing will be smooth in our country.

Putting simple but well defined ("CLEAR" !) rules might be the viable thing, along with designated spaces identified by local clubs.

Sir...That's why I am not in favour of licensing either because in India it gives rise to harassment, corruption and red tape. But clear rules should be framed and we should write to the authorities putting forth our viewpoints and inputs before the frame the rules.

So what do you say ... ? Will you send any petition on behalf of this group or shall members send individual petitions?
« Last Edit: July 23, 2015, 03:17:40 PM by santanucus » Logged
 

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
Jump to:  

Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Petition on change.org successfully created « 1 2 ... 7 8 »
Chatter Zone
sidnov 179 34533 Last post November 21, 2015, 06:28:09 PM
by chintal
seeking DGCA permission for flying
RC General Topics
Antriksh 3 1544 Last post December 04, 2015, 11:25:01 AM
by Antriksh
DGCA guidelines suggestions
RC General Topics
Gulzaar 14 4000 Last post June 29, 2016, 10:18:30 PM
by Axis power
Petition on Change.org regarding RPA draft « 1 2  All »
RC General Topics
prabal276 25 2883 Last post November 18, 2017, 10:46:50 AM
by kartp3112
ITS OUR FIGHT , petition for DGCA draft
Chatter Zone
$@!(sai) 2 1658 Last post November 17, 2017, 07:52:00 PM
by $@!(sai)