RC India
Welcome Guest, please login or register.
 
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Down
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. Topic Tools Topic Tools 
Read
« on: September 23, 2009, 03:29:13 PM »
anwar
Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 141 
anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

City: Doha (Qatar) & Thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 11619
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RC India - Flying and racing with open minds !




Is it a coincidence that all the people in the video are older gentlemen  Wink



They must be having fun reliving the glory of the past.
Logged

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.
 

Read
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2009, 03:36:19 PM »
sahilkit
LOVE MICRO RC
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 18 
sahilkit has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Hyderabad
State: Telangana
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1533
Join Date: Mar, 2009

MICROSTAR 2000



oh these chuck gliders or free flights are so much fun i can play for hours with them n still not get bored,i have started my aero modeling hobby with homemade foam free-flights !
Logged

Today might be a great and wonderful day. It depends on you.
 

Read
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2009, 04:49:02 PM »
PankajC
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 13 
PankajC has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Delhi
State: Delhi
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1022
Join Date: Jul, 2009

Learning to Fly



This is what I have been saying -

We need more people to fly

We need more options to fly both in terms of cost and types.



Pankaj
« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 04:50:39 PM by PankajC » Logged

Spektrum DX6i | EP Pusher Trainer | EP CUB |
 

Read
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2009, 05:27:37 PM »
flyingboxcar
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 22 
flyingboxcar barely matters.flyingboxcar barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 1768
Join Date: Apr, 2009



Is it a coincidence that all the people in the video are older gentlemen  Wink



They must be having fun reliving the glory of the past.

Anwar yes,
And that is lamentable as majority of people comig into this hobby are just "flyers" and not aeromodellers. Most do not realise the skills required and the amount of fun which can be had with free flight (powered/unpowered) and other branches of the hobby like CL etc. But then i guess this is the age of instant gratification and people do not have time or patience to go through the long process of learning those skills. They would rather buy and fly a toy made in some far east country and get thier share of fun.   
Logged

If you are really into scale you should be here. www.rcscalebuilder.com
 

Read
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2009, 05:55:40 PM »
anwar
Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 141 
anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

City: Doha (Qatar) & Thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 11619
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RC India - Flying and racing with open minds !



I don't know if it is lamantable  Roll Eyes 

I belong to the class that does 85% flying 14% assembling from ARFs and kits (which can be quite an undertaking when it comes to helis, where scratch building is not a practical option anyways) and 1% building from scratch.  If we go by"modeling" the immediate meaning/sense of which is about "building a model", you are right that a vast majority are not "aeromodelers", and are just "flyers".  Just to feel cozy about what people like me are doing, we are "model flyers".  I guess we are missing the fun of having our own creation in the air, but it is a lot of fun none the less.

Since the ultimate objective is to fly, I am not sure if that is something lamantable though !  Like someone pointed out, having a perfectly trimmed model, and executing maneuvers to perfection are just as fun as building a model.  Being able to identify the flying characteristics of various aircrafts, and adjusting your controls to compensate for them etc are fun activities that require skill. 

I always worry when "building" is alone considered "aeromodeling" (notwithstanding the meaning of the word itself).
 
« Last Edit: September 24, 2009, 06:52:07 PM by anwar » Logged

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.
 

Read
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2009, 08:01:14 PM »
flyingboxcar
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 22 
flyingboxcar barely matters.flyingboxcar barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 1768
Join Date: Apr, 2009



I never said building alone is considered modelling. Even for me half the fun is in flying and rest in building.
It is lamentable in the way when you see people at the filed and who can not tell a spar from a longeron and neither have any idea how to repair a model because they had no idea how the machine was built. It is lamenatble when you see people who never had the joys of building from kit/scratch (the very meaning of buiolding has changed where assembling an ARF is considered as building) and then seeing thier creation take to air, it is lamenatble when you see people fiddling with thier trims and electronic subtrims etc to get the control surfaces etc set up instead of first setting up to best mechanical advantage before going on to electronic ones. It is lamentable when people miss out the knolwedge to be gained on tools and materials which could be gained if one built (in true sense). It is lamenatble 'cause people do not gain the knowledge and the skills which could be had by trimming a free flight model to perform as intended (and beleive me that takes much better skill and understanding of laws of aerodynamics and weather than trimming a RC machine, not to mention patience and time).

But then "The old order changeth yielding palce to new"  (from The passing of King Arthur ) aptly sums it up. Having said that I also accept that every one has thier likes and dislikes and I am no one to force anyone to change thier ways. The only intention of post was to let other knows of my view and I still stand by what I have said and per me an aeromodeller is someone who can build and fly as well. If you just build and do not fly you are a builder, if you only fly you are a flyer if you do both you are aeromodeller Grin
« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 08:04:00 PM by flyingboxcar » Logged

If you are really into scale you should be here. www.rcscalebuilder.com
 

Read
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2009, 08:27:50 PM »
saikat
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 14 
saikat has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Tezpur
State: Tripura
RC Skills: Expert
Posts: 1130
Join Date: Jul, 2009



You know the greatest thing going for building ? - its Cheap

especially if you do it from scratch

Logged

 

Read
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2009, 08:33:16 PM »
anwar
Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 141 
anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

City: Doha (Qatar) & Thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 11619
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RC India - Flying and racing with open minds !



I am builder from ARFs and heli kits.  When setting up a heli to do a proper "tic-toc" say 5 times consecutively (or a few "piro-flip"s in sequence), unless your machine is really trimmed (mostly mechanically, electronic trim is a last resort), you will be all over the place. And one really needs to know the mechanical aspects of a heli to do it right.  So that puts me and many like in a position of "builder", where I went for a standard design, and part of the kit already pre cut  and pre shaped for me.  Would that put me in a 25% builder category or a 50% builder category ?

More importantly, if I am a 25% builder (in the above sense), and 75% flyer; what would I be called, based on your classification of a "builder", "flyer" and "aeromodeller" ?  Roll Eyes  Grin  Is "building/assembling an ARF"  considered "building" at all in your viewpoint ?  BTW, I intend no harm with these questions, just getting clarification on what your views are ! In some ways, I am also trying to defend the average Ramu or Raju, who just wants to fly as much as he can !!

May be most people need to realize the importance of scratch building, and that is the good I hope to get out of this discussion.

Note that everyone builds.  Not everyone does "scratch" builds. Everyone crashes, so everyone is forced to repair and tinker at some point.  That leads me to see everyone as "aeromodeller"s  >Cheesy

« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 08:51:13 PM by anwar » Logged

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.
 

Read
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2009, 08:52:56 PM »
saikat
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 14 
saikat has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Tezpur
State: Tripura
RC Skills: Expert
Posts: 1130
Join Date: Jul, 2009




More importantly, if I am a 25% builder (in the above sense), and 75% flyer; what would I be called, based on your classification of a "builder", "flyer" and "aeromodeller" ?  Roll Eyes  Grin  Is building an ARF building at all in your book ?  (BTW, I intend no harm with these questions, just getting clarification on what your views are!).  May be most people need to realize the importance of scratch building, and that is the good I hope to get out of this discussion.

Note that everyone builds.  Not everyone does "scratch" builds. So I would like to see everyone as "aeromodeller"s  >Cheesy



look up "pedantic"

far be it for me to pontificate - I'll tell you my views - I build because I like to - its a hobby after all.

The very fact we are all in this forum tells me that we are all "aeromodellers" - We are a rare breed - especially
in India and I think we are lucky that this is the hobby we chose.
Logged

 

Read
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2009, 09:05:25 PM »
flyingboxcar
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 22 
flyingboxcar barely matters.flyingboxcar barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 1768
Join Date: Apr, 2009



You know the greatest thing going for building ? - its Cheap

especially if you do it from scratch



Will have to disagree with it. Scratch building is not cheap. The Chinese with thier mass manufacture are hard to beat at the price front 
Logged

If you are really into scale you should be here. www.rcscalebuilder.com
 

Read
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2009, 09:11:58 PM »
izmile
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 7 
izmile has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Reading (England)
State: OUTSIDE INDIA
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 591
Join Date: Mar, 2009

I am a Corogamist!




If you are into SPADs then it is definitely cheap.. Rs 400 to make 2 airframes of 40 - 60 size.

I agree with Anwar on helis. I have not met anyone who has scratch built a heli.. I do remember seeing some youtube video of scratch built heli not in India though. So, in my view, if you are flying heli you are predominantly a flyer.

-Ismail


« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 09:48:55 PM by anwar » Logged

"Anything can fly" - SPADs just prove that!
 

Read
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2009, 09:17:46 PM »
flyingboxcar
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 22 
flyingboxcar barely matters.flyingboxcar barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 1768
Join Date: Apr, 2009



I am builder from ARFs and heli kits.  When setting up a heli to do a proper "tic-toc" say 5 times consecutively (or a few "piro-flip"s in sequence), unless your machine is really trimmed (mostly mechanically, electronic trim is a last resort), you will be all over the place. And one really needs to know the mechanical aspects of a heli to do it right.  So that puts me and many like in a position of "builder", where I went for a standard design, and part of the kit already pre cut  and pre shaped for me.  Would that put me in a 25% builder category or a 50% builder category ?

More importantly, if I am a 25% builder (in the above sense), and 75% flyer; what would I be called, based on your classification of a "builder", "flyer" and "aeromodeller" ?  Roll Eyes  Grin  Is "building/assembling an ARF"  considered "building" at all in your viewpoint ?  BTW, I intend no harm with these questions, just getting clarification on what your views are ! In some ways, I am also trying to defend the average Ramu or Raju, who just wants to fly as much as he can !!

May be most people need to realize the importance of scratch building, and that is the good I hope to get out of this discussion.

Note that everyone builds.  Not everyone does "scratch" builds. Everyone crashes, so everyone is forced to repair and tinker at some point.  That leads me to see everyone as "aeromodeller"s  >Cheesy

Anwar,
1. You say you build from ARF's and Heli Kits - My point this is not building just assembling. Even building form pre cut kit does not count as building for me, the least would be building from plans.This is not scratch building (here again people think that if you build from a plan it is scratch built, it is not). Unless you have desinged the plan and then cut the parts, assembeled them together and then flown that is true scratch building
2. It is good to know that you get the max from mechanical setup before you go on to electronic stuff. But the point is how many do that?
3. That would put you in 0% builder category as it does not count as building. Please refer point 1 above
4. Since you are 0% builder you would be termed (in my opinion, others are welcome to disagree) as model flyer
5. I do not hold any grudge against the average Ramu and Raju, people are welcome to do what pleases them. In my opinion it is lamentable 'cause there is much more to be learnt if one wished to
6. Not everyone builds, most assemble. Very few scratch build
7. If people built they would be better at tinkering and repairing and that would also open up the avenues for inovation and spirit of questioning if's and why's of the design.     
8 I will stick to my point not everyone is an aeromodeller in true sense
Good night for today

BTW - Heli's do not even count as airplane in my opinion they are aircrafts all right, but not an airplane
 
« Last Edit: September 23, 2009, 09:49:42 PM by anwar » Logged

If you are really into scale you should be here. www.rcscalebuilder.com
 

Read
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2009, 09:45:56 PM »
anwar
Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 141 
anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

City: Doha (Qatar) & Thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 11619
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RC India - Flying and racing with open minds !



So, in my view, if you are flying heli you are predominantly a flyer.

Dude.. that hurts !  Roll Eyes  Cry

It takes a lot of effort to "assemble" a full heli and have it properly setup mechanically and then do the CCPM stuff in the radio.  You should either try it once, or at least be around someone when they go through the process to appreciate it  Grin  I always felt it is tougher compared to say a building a foamie from sheets of foam based on a plan.
Logged

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.
 

Read
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2009, 10:45:41 PM »
santhosh
Heli Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 7 
santhosh has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 507
Join Date: Mar, 2009



i fully agree with anwar and a request to others bfor posting like this at least try to hover a heli ( may b  u  can  fly an aeroplane well), then u can feel the difference...........same thing happns in scratch building a heli and an aeroplane, recently i made a aeroplane from coroplast and it flew nicely, but i cant even think of building  a heli from a rtf kit.
Rajesh and Anwar can tell more on this

santhosh
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2009, 10:50:28 PM »
RotorZone
Forum Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 8 
RotorZone has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Bangalore
State: Karnataka
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 607
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RotorZone.com



Recently there are a spate of arguments here where people make up rules of the game (and even change it in the middle of the discussion) to win. So I am also going to make up my own rules  Grin

Why stop at the airframe to qualify as a scratch builder. You should also make your own servos and tx/rx. You should wind your own motors or build your own engine. "It is lamentable when people miss out the knowledge to be gained on tools and materials which could be gained if one built" (Uh oh, I reused a line, so this post does not count as original innovation, sigh...) There are a lot of people who do have the ability, knowledge and time to build these as well. And what about the control horns and clevises, you need to mold them yourself. Also carve the prop.

So Capt. hereby I take away the scratch builder title from you and declare you too as an assembler.  >Cheesy

You can have the title back if you build me one of your scale models. I still remember that tiger moth.
Logged

 

Read
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2009, 10:51:49 PM »
atul_pg
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 11 
atul_pg has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Pune
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 887
Join Date: May, 2009



Oops isnt this thread about gliders  Roll Eyes

ADMIN NOTE: This thread was split from http://www.rcindia.org/beginners-zone/glider-lover/ , hence the comment above.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2009, 03:30:49 PM by anwar » Logged
 

Read
« Reply #16 on: September 23, 2009, 10:58:43 PM »
izmile
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 7 
izmile has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Reading (England)
State: OUTSIDE INDIA
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 591
Join Date: Mar, 2009

I am a Corogamist!



Sorry about that Anwar. But thatz how I see it.

I go exactly with what Manish has said in the previous post. Building from kit is fun but lacks the punch of having your own design taking off to the sky. I am a 100% SPAD builder but I know how much of effort is involved in building a scale model out of balsa. If you could build something from your own design (plan), detail it (in case of a scale model)..and fly it then you are the perfect candidate for a "true aeromodeller".

Helis are a different game. Its not easy to do a scratch build unless you own a precision lathe machine and a decent workshop. Or at least hire a lathe shop to make your design... Scale modeling of heli is next to impossible for an average modeller. So, the only option is to "assemble" from a kit. This will never qualify as a scratch build eventhough you have the qualities of a "true aeromodeller"... In my books, becomming a true aeromodeller the heli way is very very difficult... You need to design and scratch build your own heli... thatz my point of view, others may differ.

And yes, I know its difficult to fly a Heli than an aeroplane. But I do not think that can compensate for the design/build skill. Both are different ain't it?

BTW, I fully respect the Heli crowd here and I do admire their skill. Helis require true skill in building and flying as well...

-Ismail
Logged

"Anything can fly" - SPADs just prove that!
 

Read
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2009, 11:44:59 PM »
anwar
Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 141 
anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

City: Doha (Qatar) & Thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 11619
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RC India - Flying and racing with open minds !



Oops isnt this thread about gliders  Roll Eyes

Come on.. you should have figured it out by now.  It works something like this.

1) Everyone has an opinion (aka "butt-hole") on everything.
2) Speak your mind fearlessly about your butt-hole regardless of the topic. Hijack any topic, we will fix it later (see [5] below). You run the risk of getting nasty PMs, like the one I got from Sai recently, to which I responded, and his response back was "Relax". Moral of the story, you can be pretty mean and get away with it !
3) Speak with passion and logic (as much as possible, it is highly debatable it itself though!).  This tickles others ego, and forces them to pitch in with their own butt-holes.
4) A heated discussion follows, which may be completely unrelated to the original topic.  But the information is useful, about 75% of the time.
5) When there is enough discussion, SPLIT THE THREAD into a new one. For example, this will soon be something like "Are you man enough to be an aeromodeller?"  ("Kya aap paanchvi pass sey tez hai?")
6) END RESULT - We have an active forum, not one with one post a day.  Everyone learns a bit, everyone feels self-important, everyone waits for the next round !

And that is my grand strategy ! Some people think it is fake.  Some think we are not serious (which brings up the point, should a "hobby" ever be "totally serious"?). I would say just look at the sanity and logic of arguments, and not try to find (or feel) any "tone behind the arguments".  The only time I was kidding was with Sai and Saju (based on somewhat of a mutual understanding), and even then, the arguments were sane !

 
« Last Edit: September 24, 2009, 12:07:12 AM by anwar » Logged

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.
 

Read
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2009, 12:14:20 AM »
izmile
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 7 
izmile has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Reading (England)
State: OUTSIDE INDIA
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 591
Join Date: Mar, 2009

I am a Corogamist!



Man! this butt-hole thing is catching on...!!  Grin Grin
Logged

"Anything can fly" - SPADs just prove that!
 

Read
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2009, 12:52:17 AM »
anwar
Administrator
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 141 
anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!anwar is awe-inspiring!
Offline Offline

City: Doha (Qatar) & Thrissur
State: Kerala
RC Skills: Advanced
Posts: 11619
Join Date: Mar, 2009

RC India - Flying and racing with open minds !



Why stop at the airframe to qualify as a scratch builder. You should also make your own servos and tx/rx.

So Capt. hereby I take away the scratch builder title from you and declare you too as an assembler.  >Cheesy

If I ever get accused of murder, you can be my lawyer... TWICE  Grin
Logged

Hangar : Please see my introduction.
RC India forum and me : About this forum.
 

Read
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2009, 01:44:53 AM »
tg
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 1 
tg has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Bangalore
State: Karnataka
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 553
Join Date: Oct, 2009



Ok...

To all builders - why not post pics of your planes and let the forum comment on your building skills!!

To all flyers - why not post videos of your flying skills and let the forum comment!!

That should cement whether we should be calling ourselves or each other as flyers/builders/modellers - and make the forum all the more focussed on planes and flying and building than those stinky b**t h***s!!
Logged
 

Read
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2009, 10:19:11 AM »
sahilkit
LOVE MICRO RC
Plane Lover
Forum Hero

*****

Reputation Power: 18 
sahilkit has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: Hyderabad
State: Telangana
RC Skills: Beginner
Posts: 1533
Join Date: Mar, 2009

MICROSTAR 2000



 Huh?
Logged

Today might be a great and wonderful day. It depends on you.
 

Read
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2009, 12:04:16 PM »
flyingboxcar
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 22 
flyingboxcar barely matters.flyingboxcar barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 1768
Join Date: Apr, 2009



Recently there are a spate of arguments here where people make up rules of the game (and even change it in the middle of the discussion) to win. So I am also going to make up my own rules  Grin

Why stop at the airframe to qualify as a scratch builder. You should also make your own servos and tx/rx. You should wind your own motors or build your own engine. "It is lamentable when people miss out the knowledge to be gained on tools and materials which could be gained if one built" (Uh oh, I reused a line, so this post does not count as original innovation, sigh...) There are a lot of people who do have the ability, knowledge and time to build these as well. And what about the control horns and clevises, you need to mold them yourself. Also carve the prop.

So Capt. hereby I take away the scratch builder title from you and declare you too as an assembler.  >Cheesy

You can have the title back if you build me one of your scale models. I still remember that tiger moth.

Rajesh,
Will build anything if the time and effort are rightly compensated.
Yes I can carve a prop myself and have done that too, can not say how many have ever even heard of even that. Yes control horns have been made and so are the clevises with piano wire. If any one is interested I can still teach them. Before the advent of ready made stuff being available and due to shortage of funds that was the rule build your own.
And every one who has responded to my post have missed a very important point and  that is the root of my lament. Today only RC and ic/electric powered models count as models. Why do I need to even build an RC or an engine when an unpowered glider or a rubber powered model can take more skills?     
To add on to the lamentable things here is one more
People do not have ability to see others point of view let alone accept one. And oh BTW the butt hole thing is pretty old people need to invent something new. If you or anyone else has taken the trouble through my entire posts it would be noticed that right in the begining I had said that people are welcome to do what pleases them, my point was that I can not force them to do what I think is right.   
Logged

If you are really into scale you should be here. www.rcscalebuilder.com
 

Read
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2009, 12:22:00 PM »
flyingboxcar
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 22 
flyingboxcar barely matters.flyingboxcar barely matters.
Offline Offline

City: Chennai
State: Tamil Nadu
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 1768
Join Date: Apr, 2009



And the last post on this topic from me.
For Anwar,
The feeling which I get always from most of the posts on various threads at the forum is what others say is always wrong, whereas some people have the right to be always right (I even know some one is going to turn around that sentence and accuse me of the same, but I feel there is a difference. I have never insisted that what I say everyone should agree to that, rather have been painstakingly insisting that, this was only my butt err! opinion)
As for hijacking someone's thread, since what we have been saying was being attacked it was but logical to rebutt. The administrator had the rights and wherewithall to move all the unconnected threads to a new one.   
And the last point
Before those ARF helis became available enmass, it was the rule that the pioneer's in heli flying built thier own helis and flew them, Yes they were true aeromodellers.
So if you just buy a heli kit, assemble it and do your electronic and mechanical wizardry, and fly it in most amazing manner you do have lots of skills in various fields but no, you are not an aeromodeller.   
Logged

If you are really into scale you should be here. www.rcscalebuilder.com
 

Read
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2009, 12:50:14 PM »
sushil_anand
Plane Lover
Forum Hero
*****

Reputation Power: 17 
sushil_anand has no influence.
Offline Offline

City: MUMBAI
State: Maharashtra
RC Skills: Intermediate
Posts: 1274
Join Date: Jul, 2009



Quote
Some think we are not serious (which brings up the point, should a "hobby" ever be "totally serious"?). I would say just look at the sanity and logic of arguments, and not try to find (or feel) any "tone behind the arguments".

"totally serious " - No. But certainly not frivolous either. When there is not much "sanity and logic" evident then one, understandably, feels a "tone behind" them.

Quote
The feeling which I get always from most of the posts on various threads at the forum is what others say is always wrong, whereas some people have the right to be always right

Will second that.


Logged

Hangar: Zlin 50L -120, CMPro Super Chipmunk, Ultimate Bipe EP, Imagine 50, Christen Eagle 160, Ultra Stick, Super Sports Senior
 

Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Up
Jump to: